🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a disagreement between a closed attraction, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense debate over their fate often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the federal government prevented the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to end their lives unless the government funds the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and group interactions suggest they are deeply intelligent animals – something one caretaker learned personally.

Burgess spent three years as a whale caretaker, a position that required gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She formed a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with different personalities.

“One whale chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I view connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her three years at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the facility links to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the shutdown. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but earlier stated: “The whales … receive far higher quality medical attention and around the clock care than any person in the UK, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in the spring following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park thought information of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was let go soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s threat to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any efforts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports demands for the whales to be transferred promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In recent months, Canada’s government official rejected a bid to transfer the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a continued situation in confinement and a return to performance for audiences,” the official stated. “As society, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reflect a broader misunderstanding of the circumstances of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As authorities attempt to find a answer, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.

A suggested refuge in the province of Nova Scotia, which has received official endorsement, has proven most controversial. The planned location, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain hopeful that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the short term.

The project lead, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will mimic the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|